воскресенье, 28 августа 2011 г.

Molecular Biology: The Evolution of Organisms Collections



If you could be demonstrated that any one of the existing complex organisms could not have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would completely fell apart. "Charles Darwin.

Up to 1859goda, most people believed that life is too complicated for what it could occur without the help of the creator. But when Charles Darwin published his "Origin of Species", materialists see the theory of the origin of man, as apparently supporting an atheistic worldview, where God has been deleted. Although Darwin was not a materialist, his theory has become an integral part in the teaching of the materialists, that God is irrelevant in my life. But since then, it took about 150 years.

In 1859, there was no idea of ​​how a living cell at its molecular level. Darwin argued that biological systems, including cell gradually evolve through natural selection, during the great periods of time. But since then, science has advanced considerably, and the organisms and biological systems, of which Darwin suggested that they are simple, proved to be incredibly complex and interdependent.

An unchanging set of organisms.

Incidentally, the recent discoveries in molecular biology have shown that some organisms and biological systems operate only when the individual parts are fully developed, so that they could not evolve gradually. Biochemist Michael Behe ​​likened their interdependence with a mousetrap that can not catch a mouse, in that case, if all components of its design is not working properly and harmoniously. Behe identified these bodies as not developing the elements of the system.

Darwin knew that his theory has problems. In particular, he was concerned by such authority as the eye and how it could happen without anyone or development. He suggested that this body could be formed pozhagovo.

The truth is that in the nineteenth century, Darwin knew very little about the intricate interdependence and complexity of the structure of the eye. Now with the help of powerful microscopes, microbiologists, like Behe, have the opportunity to explore the depth of the eye, and its inner workings. Molecular biology has discovered that every human eye has over 100 million rods and cones, which perceive both 1.5 million posts.


This system works similar to a television camera has auto focus, and has six million cones that are able to distinguish seven million colors.

Behe pointed out that the eye is not developing a complex organ that could never evolve gradually, through natural selection. Materialists such as Dawkins, believe that it is possible to imagine that the eye could evolve gradually, in accordance with Darwin's theory. But one thing is thought of as the eye could evolve gradually, but quite another matter that there are scientific facts are obvious, completely refute the idea.

Darwin himself said that he never worried about how to form such a body such as eyes, and was never convinced that his theory is correct.

Later in life Darwin told his friend:

"At the moment my eyes cast down in a cold shudder." Charles Darwin.

The cage is another example of an interdependent complex system. It acts as an entire factory with a lot of working parts that need to be perfectly synchronized with each other. An example of this DNA molecule instruktiruemaya with RNA, for that would build other proteins in the process is so subtle and complex that it lay far beyond the ever imagined by Darwin. Biochemist Michael Behe ​​wrote about research and about the incredible complexity of the individual components of living organisms, in his "Darwin's Black Box."

"In the face of incredible complexity that modern biochemistry has opened in a cage, all the modern scientific community has stood still paralyzed." Professor Michael Behe

To Behe ​​joined by other scholars who see the manifestation of the divine hand in the complexity of life. Cosmologist Alan Sandage repeated term Behe;

"The more one studies the biochemistry, the more it becomes unbelievable, there's just ignore the universal organizing principle - the Creator for the believers." Cosmologist Alan Sandadzh.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий